AN ANALYTICAL STUDY OF MATERIAIS CONSTITUENTS OF A HISTORICAL MAP ON A WOODEN FRAME OF UPPER EGYPT DATED TO 1882 AND THEIR MUTUAL DAMAGE
Eman Nabil;
Abstract
[EN] This study analyzes one of the heritage maps of Upper Egypt, which dates back to 1882, and is now
part of the Qasr al-Qobba Library. It discusses the theme and manufacturing techniques of the map and
the effect of wood, textile, and paper on the map’s anatomic structure. Several tests and analyses were
carried out to study how the map was manufactured and to chart where the map was damaged. The
techniques included visual examination, infrared examination (IR), ultraviolet (UV), microbiological
examination, digital, optical microscope, Raman, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) with energy
dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) unit, and Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). The
analytical study of the map with different methods allowed for determining how it was damaged. The
results of the microscopic examination of microbiological isolates showed that the most common fungi
were Trichoderma, Aspergillus, and Penicillium). Microscopic examination showed that the type of
printing was chromolithography. The damage rates in the functional groups of cellulose were also
examined to identify the media as gum Arabic; the adhesive between the layers of the map was animal
glue. The results revealed that pigments were identified as lazurite and carbon, and the wood of the map
frame was identified as beech. Textile and paper were identified as cotton. All these steps were preceded
by measuring the pH of the paper. The analytical study is important in determining map-making
techniques in 1882. This study examines how the presence of multiple layers and materials- such as
fabric, wood and paer- affect the detioration of this map.
part of the Qasr al-Qobba Library. It discusses the theme and manufacturing techniques of the map and
the effect of wood, textile, and paper on the map’s anatomic structure. Several tests and analyses were
carried out to study how the map was manufactured and to chart where the map was damaged. The
techniques included visual examination, infrared examination (IR), ultraviolet (UV), microbiological
examination, digital, optical microscope, Raman, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) with energy
dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) unit, and Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). The
analytical study of the map with different methods allowed for determining how it was damaged. The
results of the microscopic examination of microbiological isolates showed that the most common fungi
were Trichoderma, Aspergillus, and Penicillium). Microscopic examination showed that the type of
printing was chromolithography. The damage rates in the functional groups of cellulose were also
examined to identify the media as gum Arabic; the adhesive between the layers of the map was animal
glue. The results revealed that pigments were identified as lazurite and carbon, and the wood of the map
frame was identified as beech. Textile and paper were identified as cotton. All these steps were preceded
by measuring the pH of the paper. The analytical study is important in determining map-making
techniques in 1882. This study examines how the presence of multiple layers and materials- such as
fabric, wood and paer- affect the detioration of this map.
Other data
| Title | AN ANALYTICAL STUDY OF MATERIAIS CONSTITUENTS OF A HISTORICAL MAP ON A WOODEN FRAME OF UPPER EGYPT DATED TO 1882 AND THEIR MUTUAL DAMAGE | Authors | Eman Nabil | Keywords | Paper scraps, Raman, color pigments, chromolithography, lazurite. | Issue Date | 13-Jun-2025 | Journal | Journal of the General Union of Arab Archaeologists | Start page | 1 | End page | 23 | DOI | 10.21608/jguaa2.2024.283631.1186 |
Attached Files
| File | Description | Size | Format | Existing users please Login |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JGUAA23610811748725200.pdf | 2.78 MB | Adobe PDF | Request a copy |
Similar Items from Core Recommender Database
Items in Ain Shams Scholar are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.