Comparison Between The Effects of Ionized Versus Non-Ionized Contrast Media Injection With and Without The Use Of N-acetylcysteine On Renal Functions With Renal Impairment Patients Undergoing Coronary Angiography

Soumaya Sayed Matter;

Abstract


Contrast-induced nephropathy is the third most common cause of hospital-acquired acute renal failure, after surgery and hypotension. With the increasing use of radiographic contrast media in diagnostic and interventional procedures, contrast-induced nephr


Other data

Title Comparison Between The Effects of Ionized Versus Non-Ionized Contrast Media Injection With and Without The Use Of N-acetylcysteine On Renal Functions With Renal Impairment Patients Undergoing Coronary Angiography
Authors Soumaya Sayed Matter
Keywords Comparison Between The Effects of Ionized Versus Non-Ionized Contrast Media Injection With and Without The Use Of N-acetylcysteine On Renal Functions With Renal Impairment Patients Undergoing Coronary Angiography
Issue Date 2008
Description 
Contrast-induced nephropathy is the third most common cause of hospital-acquired acute renal failure, after surgery and hypotension. With the increasing use of radiographic contrast media in diagnostic and interventional procedures, contrast-induced nephr

Recommend this item

Similar Items from Core Recommender Database

Google ScholarTM

Check

views 5 in Shams Scholar


Items in Ain Shams Scholar are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.