Diagnostic Accuracy of Cone Beam Computed Tomography with Different Voxel Sizes versus
Dalia Ali Hussein;
Abstract
Abstract:
Background: Identification of the root canal/s is crucial for success of
endodontic treatment. The aim of this study is to assess the diagnostic
accuracy of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) different voxel sizes
to identify mesiobuccal (MB2) canals in maxillary molars, and to know
which one that gives the best image resolution with the least patient
radiation exposure. Methodology: The teeth enrolled in this diagnostic
study were 17 Extracted human upper 1st and 2nd permanent molars with
complete root formation. All molars were scanned by CBCT using 0.3mm;
0.2mm (61x78 mm FOV) and 0.125mm (50x50 mm FOV) voxel sizes and
the mesiobuccal (MB) canals were counted in the scanned images in each
root by three different experience observers. Cone beam computed
tomography images were acquired with Scanora 3Dx machine (Sorredex-
Finland), at 90 kVp and 16 mA. Tooth sectioning was selected as reference
standard method based on that it is the best method that provides accurate
information about the number of root canals in a molar tooth. Results: No
Significant difference was found regarding the detection of MB2 canals
among CBCT 0.3, 0.2 and 0.125 different voxel sizes versus root sectioning.
Conclusion: Neither the utilized voxel measurements nor the experienced
radiologists can affect the detection of MB2 canal; also the definition of
multiple canals by CBCT at any level does not necessarily means canals that
are accessible clinically.
Background: Identification of the root canal/s is crucial for success of
endodontic treatment. The aim of this study is to assess the diagnostic
accuracy of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) different voxel sizes
to identify mesiobuccal (MB2) canals in maxillary molars, and to know
which one that gives the best image resolution with the least patient
radiation exposure. Methodology: The teeth enrolled in this diagnostic
study were 17 Extracted human upper 1st and 2nd permanent molars with
complete root formation. All molars were scanned by CBCT using 0.3mm;
0.2mm (61x78 mm FOV) and 0.125mm (50x50 mm FOV) voxel sizes and
the mesiobuccal (MB) canals were counted in the scanned images in each
root by three different experience observers. Cone beam computed
tomography images were acquired with Scanora 3Dx machine (Sorredex-
Finland), at 90 kVp and 16 mA. Tooth sectioning was selected as reference
standard method based on that it is the best method that provides accurate
information about the number of root canals in a molar tooth. Results: No
Significant difference was found regarding the detection of MB2 canals
among CBCT 0.3, 0.2 and 0.125 different voxel sizes versus root sectioning.
Conclusion: Neither the utilized voxel measurements nor the experienced
radiologists can affect the detection of MB2 canal; also the definition of
multiple canals by CBCT at any level does not necessarily means canals that
are accessible clinically.
Other data
| Title | Diagnostic Accuracy of Cone Beam Computed Tomography with Different Voxel Sizes versus | Other Titles | الدقة التشخيصية للأشعة المقطعية بالحاسوب مخروطية الشعاع ذات الأحجام المختلفة لمكون الصورة | Authors | Dalia Ali Hussein | Issue Date | 2018 |
Recommend this item
Similar Items from Core Recommender Database
Items in Ain Shams Scholar are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.