A Comparative Study between Ultrasound Guided Trans-muscular Quadratus Lumborum Block Versus Ultrasound Guided Transversus Abdominis Plane Block as postoperative analgesia in Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery

Peter Nashaat Ramzy Youwakiem;

Abstract


variety of unwanted post-operative consequences, including patient suffering, distress, respiratory complications, delirium, myocardial ischemia, prolonged hospital stay and an increased likelihood of chronic pain due to poorly controlled acute pain after laparoscopic abdominal surgery.
The goals of providing safe, effective analgesia, with minimal side effects for the patient, together with inhibition of trauma-induced nociceptive impulses are the analgesic regimen need to be met.
Many studies provide different pain modalities as local infiltration of the surgical field, systemic analgesia (narcotics and non-narcotics), neuro-axial blocks, and nerve blocks shined out, however each has shown its side effect that limits its use to specific cases.
Abdominal field blocks are simple to perform and have a good safety profile, also have been extensively used for a variety of surgical procedures for many years


Other data

Title A Comparative Study between Ultrasound Guided Trans-muscular Quadratus Lumborum Block Versus Ultrasound Guided Transversus Abdominis Plane Block as postoperative analgesia in Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery
Other Titles دراسة مقارنة بين إحصار العضلة المربعة القطنية الموجه بالموجات فوق الصوتية مقابل إحصار العضلة المستعرضة عن طريق البطن الموجه بالموجات فوق الصوتية كمسكن بعد الجراحة فى جراحات السمنة بالمنظار
Authors Peter Nashaat Ramzy Youwakiem
Issue Date 2019

Attached Files

File SizeFormat
CC6140.pdf364.67 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Recommend this item

Similar Items from Core Recommender Database

Google ScholarTM

Check

views 4 in Shams Scholar
downloads 3 in Shams Scholar


Items in Ain Shams Scholar are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.